The RELEVANT Martin Luther King, Jr.
Part 1: Vietnam or Iraq?
Part 2: Poverty and Race
Part 3: The Mountaintop Prescription
Part 4: Sports Writers Speak about MLK
Yesterday, we gave you Part 1 of the RELEVANT Martin Luther King where excerpts from his 1967 Vietnam War speech and how they ring just as true to our current situation in Iraq. Many politicians today have manipulated the “I Have a Dream Speech” to conclude that King would be an opponent for governmental interventions against the fight against poverty. But any honest study of King’s last few years would blow such political rhetoric out of the water. At a present time where our presidential candidates debate solutions for predatory lending and our mortgage crises; the courts are reversing affirmative action policies, and there exist unprecedented race and class disparities in our educational and criminal justice systems, King’s words offer direction for our present day leaders.
Today the floor is yielded to author Michael Eric Dyson as excerpts are taken from Chapter One of his book: I May Not Get There With You – The True Martin Luther King, Jr. Dyson tells us:
King was on a 1968 swing through rural, poor parts of the black South, drumming up support for his Poor People’s March on Washington later that year. He had stopped at a small white wood-frame church in Mississippi to press his case, and to listen to the woes of the poor. A painting of a white Jesus, nearly ubiquitous in black churches, observed their every move. Later King would absorb more tales of Mississippi’s material misery. .."You all are really to be admired," King compassionately offers, "and I want you to know that you have my moral support. I’m going to be praying for you. I’m going to be coming back to see you and we are going to be demanding, when we go to Washington, that something be done and done immediately about these conditions."
King couldn’t keep that promise; his life would be snuffed out a mere three weeks before his massive campaign reached its destination. But King hammered home the rationale behind his attempt to unite the desperately poor. He understood that the government owed something to the masses of black folk who had been left behind as America parceled out land and money to whites while exploiting black labor.
"At the very same time that America refused to give the Negro any land," King argues, "through an act of Congress our government was giving away millions of acres of land in the West and the Midwest, which meant it was willing to undergird its white peasants from Europe with an economic floor." Building a full head of steam, King rolls his rhetoric down the track of just compensation for blacks by contrasting even more sharply the unequal treatment of the races in education, agriculture, and subsidies.
"But not only did they give them land," King’s indictment speeds on, "they built land grant colleges with government money to teach them how to farm. Not only that, they provided county agents to further their expertise in farming. Not only that, they provided low interest rates in order that they could mechanize their farms."
King links white privilege and governmental support directly to black suffering, and thus underscores the hypocrisy of whites who have been helped demanding that blacks thrive through self-help.
"Not only that," King says in delivering the death blow to fallacies about the black unwillingness to work, "today many of these people are receiving millions of dollars in federal subsidies not to farm, and they are the very people telling the black man that he ought to lift himself by his own bootstraps. And this is what we are faced with, and this is the reality."
With one final fell swoop, King reinforces his identification with the destitute, reiterates his belief that the government has failed in its fiduciary obligations to blacks, and subverts the stereotype of blacks shiftlessly waiting around for government cash by insisting that blacks deserve what is coming to them."Now, when we come to Washington in this campaign, we are coming to get our check."
——————————————-
You can read Dyson’s entire Chapter One of his book right here and discover why he thinks we should have a moratorium on the “I Have A Dream Speech” for at least 10 years. Tomorrow we come back with Part III of the RELEVANT Martin Luther King by focusing on consolidation of Black Economic Power and Part IV will address "White Responsibility". The mainstream media has snatched MLK’s balls, and the least we can do is give them back.
Related:
The RELEVANT Martin Luther King, Jr.
Part 1: Vietnam or Iraq?
Part 2: Poverty and Race
Part 3: The Mountaintop Prescription
Part 4: Sports Writers Speak about MLK





Speaking on the subject of the poor:
Isn’t it interesting that most good folk are opposed to giving the poor a “hand out” because they feel they are lazy. Yet corporations come begging, and they get money by the billions and no one says a thing.
Kos, thank you for pointing that out!
While there are the fewest people receiving public assistance since 1969, there has been no similar revolution in the corporate welfare state. I guess “personal responsibility” doesn’t apply to the wealthiest billionaires in our country. Unlike poor people, not only can they fight back, but they can and do buy off all of America’s politicians (Republican, Democrat, whoever) in exchange for staying on the government’s tit.
How many Americans know that corporate subsidies and tax benefits eclipse the annual social welfare allocation for core programs such as
AFDC, student aid, housing, food and nutrition, and all direct public assistance (excluding Soc. Sec. & medical care).
You may have heard of some of these starving companies included in the report: http://ctj.org/pdf/corp0402.pdf.:
– WALMART: With the Walton family having 5 of the top ten richest billionaires in the world one could understand how bad they need the money. http://reclaimdemocracy.org/independent_business/walmart_eminent_domain.html
– ENRON paid no income taxes at all in 4 of 5 years, despite $1.8 billion in reported U.S. profits. Enron’s total taxes over the five years were a NEGATIVE $381 million. Its corporate tax welfare totaled $1.0 billion.
– MICROSOFT: More than $12 billion in total tax breaks over the past 5 years. In fact, , Despite $12.3 billion in reported U.S. profits, Microsoft actually paid no tax at all in 1999. Microsoft’s tax rate for the past two years was only 1.8 percent on $22 billion in pretax U.S. profits.
– GENERAL ELECTRIC: Almost $12 billion in corporate tax welfare for GE.
– IBM: In 1997, IBM reported $3.1 billion in U.S. profits, and instead of paying taxes, got an outright tax rebate. Over the past five years, IBM enjoyed a total of $4.7 billion in corporate tax welfare.
…this is the type of shit that MLK would be railing against today if his past record is any indication…
None…
None…